Trade Review

MNQ1! Long — 2026-02-12

Share

The objective is not to grade the P&L. It is to grade the decision.

Loss · Average Loss·RAS 76%

Charts

Click to enlarge

Trade Review

📊 Trade 1 – NQ Buy (Counter-Trend Attempt) Setup

  • ▸5m bullish FVG: 25,344–25,365
  • ▸High of day swept → 25,420
  • ▸Retrace into FVG midpoint
  • ▸Attempted continuation to weekly high Entry
  • ▸Long 25,355
  • ▸Stop 25,315 (40 pts)
  • ▸Target 25,465 (3R) Issue You attempted to front-run the larger volatility expansion. VIX was already accelerating into HTF liquidity. That was not a retracement environment — that was expansion. This was the wrong trade contextually. You were trading: “We should bounce first.” But the tape was saying: “We are repricing aggressively.” Loss:
  • ▸~[amount redacted]in 150K
  • ▸~[amount redacted]in one 300K
  • ▸Contained because copy trader malfunction limited exposure That malfunction actually protected you.
Setup Tags
VIX Gap FailureVIX Inverse Correlation+BOS+FVG+IFVG+IFVG MM SetupLTF
Execution Quality
Early
Emotions
FOMOPatient

Rule Adherence Scorecard

Setup Grade—
RAS Score7.6/10 · 76%
Narrative
9/10▼
Setup
7/10▼
Entry
7/10▼
Risk
8/10▼
Sizing
7/10▼
Management
8/10▼
Time
7/10▼
Emotions
8/10▼

Chart Links

Written by Cory

Cory publishes the working thesis before the session, not after — this Playbook and Trade Review are part of that same documented process. No signals, no highlight reel.

Read the full story →