MES1! Short — 2026-03-09
The objective is not to grade the P&L. It is to grade the decision.
Charts
Trade Review
Trade Review Date: Monday, March 9, 2026 Instrument: ES Accounts Affected:
- ▸1 × [amount redacted] Combine (blown due to platform execution issue)
- ▸5 × [amount redacted] PA Accounts (profitable)
Net Result:
- ▸Combine Loss: -[amount redacted]
- ▸PA Accounts Profit: +[amount redacted]each (~[amount redacted]total)
1️⃣ Narrative Alignment
Grade: B+
Your macro narrative was actually very solid.
Key elements you correctly identified:
- ▸VIX trading above the 9:30 gap
- ▸Potential bearish pressure early
- ▸Bullish FVG inverted → bearish IFVG
- ▸Expectation of a sell into downside liquidity
- ▸Clear downside targets:
- ▸
- ▸6644
- ▸6624
- ▸6584.50
- ▸
This is consistent with your IFVG continuation model.
However, the context shifted quickly:
- ▸VIX failed to hold strength.
- ▸VIX rejected 31.84 high and began selling off.
- ▸That created the buy setup instead of continuation short.
You recognized this shift correctly later.
Narrative recognition was strong.
2️⃣ Liquidity Map
Grade: A
Your liquidity mapping was excellent.
Key areas marked correctly:
- ▸Bullish FVG → inverted → IFVG
- ▸Overlapping bearish FVG
- ▸Structural highs:
- ▸
- ▸6701
- ▸6694
- ▸
- ▸Downside liquidity:
- ▸
- ▸6644
- ▸6624
- ▸6584
- ▸
You also correctly recognized the 4H structure overhead and NWOG levels.
The structure was very clear and tradable.
3️⃣ Higher Time Frame Structure
Grade: B
The HTF context had mixed signals.
Important elements:
- ▸Prior day heavy sell pressure
- ▸Price trading inside HTF FVG
- ▸Early liquidity sweeps
- ▸VIX initial strength → later collapse
Your first bias (short) was reasonable.
But the HTF environment was transitioning from distribution to reversal.
You adapted correctly once VIX began selling.
That’s a strong skill.
4️⃣ Lower Time Frame Confirmation
Grade: A-
The buy setup execution was very clean.
Entry: 6665
Stop: 6654 (11 points)
Target: 6694
Trade structure:
- ▸Minimal drawdown (1–2 points)
- ▸Quick move in your favor
- ▸Stop moved after +5 points
- ▸Partial exits executed
Partials:
- ▸6677.50
- ▸6681.75
- ▸6694
Trade traveled 29 points total. Execution on the long side was excellent.
5️⃣ Risk Management
Grade: C
This is where the day lost points.
Not because of trade logic.
But because of process violation.
You identified multiple red flags:
- ▸Computer glitching before open
- ▸Websites failing to load
- ▸Orders not executing
- ▸Orders stacking unexpectedly
Yet the trade was still taken.
The result:
- ▸11 orders executed
- ▸20 contracts each
- ▸Immediate [amount redacted]+ drawdown
- ▸Trailing drawdown hit
- ▸Combine account lost
This was not a strategy failure. This was a technology environment violation.
Your own rule:
“If platform stability is questionable, do not trade.”
You broke your own rule.
6️⃣ Execution Discipline
Grade: B
Mixed execution day.
Poor execution (combine)
- ▸Multiple entries sent
- ▸Platform lag created position stacking
- ▸Trade triggered far from intended entry
Planned entry: 6667.75
Actual execution: 6652.25
That is 15 points of slippage. On 20 contracts that is [amount redacted]per contract move. The system essentially created a forced oversized trade.
Excellent execution (PA accounts) You reset mentally.
You recognized:
- ▸VIX rejection
- ▸Market inversion
- ▸Buy setup forming
Then executed the clean long trade.
That shows strong recovery discipline.
7️⃣ Emotional Control Grade: B+
Your emotional response was honest but controlled.
You acknowledged:
- ▸frustration
- ▸mistake
- ▸rule violation
But importantly:
You did not revenge trade. You executed the next setup correctly. Many traders would have spiraled after losing a combine. You did not. That is a sign of maturity.
8️⃣ Model Integrity
Grade: A-
Both setups were actually valid.
Setup 1 – Short
Logic was correct:
- ▸IFVG
- ▸Bearish FVG overlap
- ▸Liquidity targets below
The setup itself was not wrong. Execution environment ruined it.
Setup 2 – Long
This was the correct pivot trade:
- ▸VIX rejection
- ▸IFVG inversion
- ▸Structure reclaim
- ▸Momentum shift
Trade worked almost perfectly.
But There Is a Huge Positive
The actual trading skill displayed today is A-level.
You:
- ▸Identified both setups
- ▸Adapted to market shift
- ▸Executed the long trade correctly
- ▸Managed risk well once in the trade
- ▸Produced [amount redacted]across PA accounts
Skill was not the issue. Environment discipline was.
Key Lesson from Today
Create a Hard Rule:
🚨 Platform Stability Rule
Do not trade if:
- ▸Orders fail
- ▸Internet stalls
- ▸Charts lag
- ▸Platform freezes
- ▸Order confirmations delay
Immediate shutdown. No exceptions.
The Big Picture
Even with the combine loss:
You now have [amount redacted] in prop firm capital Across your PA accounts. Today still produced ~[amount redacted]profit. That is a professional trading day, despite the combine loss.
Rule Adherence Scorecard
| Narrative | 8/10▼ |
| Setup | 8/10▼ |
| Entry | 2/10▼ |
| Risk | 2/10▼ |
| Sizing | 2/10▼ |
| Management | 4/10▼ |
| Time | 3/10▼ |
| Emotions | 5/10▼ |
Chart Links
Cory publishes the working thesis before the session, not after — this Playbook and Trade Review are part of that same documented process. No signals, no highlight reel.
Read the full story →