Trade Review

MES1! No Trade2026-03-31

Share

The objective is not to grade the P&L. It is to grade the decision.

B- Setup·Flat Day · Capital Preservation·RAS 64%

Charts

1 / 3

Trade Review

📊 Trade Review – Tuesday 3/31/26 (No Trade Day)

Narrative Alignment (1–10): 6

  • You had a clear HTF narrative mapped the night before

  • You correctly identified:

    • Weekly FVG interaction
    • Sweep + expansion potential
  • BUT…

    • You invalidated the narrative too early
    • Assumed “day is done” without re-evaluation

👉 Key Issue: Narrative was correct → commitment to it was weak

Liquidity Map (1–10): 8

  • Strong understanding of:

    • PDH liquidity
    • Internal range highs
    • Order block stacking (6458–6471 zone)
  • Correctly identified expansion path (0 → 1 → continuation)

👉 You literally mapped the move that happened

HTF Structure (1–10): 8

  • Recognized:
    • Weekly FVG support reaction
    • Transition from bearish → bullish expansion
  • Identified:
    • Range → expansion environment

👉 Structure read was high level and accurate

LTF Confirmation (1–10): 3

  • This is where the breakdown happened:

  • Missed:

      - 5m + 15m FVG formation (~7:05)
      - 8:15 retracement entry
      - Clean OB + FVG confluence
    

👉 Not a skill issue → screen presence issue

Risk Management (1–10): 10

  • No trade = no risk taken
  • Capital preserved perfectly

👉 This is still elite behavior

Execution Discipline (1–10): 4

  • You pre-decided not to trade

  • Did NOT:

    • Reassess at key time (London → NY transition)
    • Stay engaged with market development

👉 This is a process discipline flaw, not emotional trading

Emotional Control (1–10): 7

  • No revenge trading
  • No forcing entries after missing move

BUT:

  • Slight frustration afterward
  • Awareness of distraction (Thailand trip)

👉 Controlled—but mentally slightly disengaged

Model Integrity (1–10): 5

  • Your model:
    • Called the move ✔️
    • Defined levels ✔️

BUT:

  • You did not allow the model to execute
  • You exited the process before confirmation

👉 Model = strong 👉 Trust in model = inconsistent

📊 RAS Score

Narrative: 6   Liquidity: 8   HTF Structure: 8   LTF Confirmation: 3   Risk: 10   Execution: 4   Emotions: 7   Model Integrity: 5  

Total: 51 / 80 → 63.75%

🏁 Final Grade: B-

🎯 Main Improvement Areas 1. No More “Day is Done” Before NY Open This is your biggest mistake today. Rule to implement: ❗ “No-trade decision cannot be finalized before 9:30 AM”

2. Mandatory Reassessment Windows You need structure to prevent disengagement

Add this:

  • 6:30 AM → Initial check
  • 8:00 AM → Re-evaluate
  • 10:30 AM → Final decision

👉 If you skip these → automatic discipline violation

3. Presence > Prediction You were:

  • Right on direction
  • Wrong on participation

👉 Your edge is NOT prediction 👉 Your edge is reaction to confirmation

🧠 Key Insight From The Day

You didn’t miss the trade because you were wrong… You missed it because you checked out too early

That’s a completely different problem—and a fixable one.

⚖️ Bottom Line

  • Your analysis is now at a high level
  • Your execution problem is shifting from overtrading → under-participation This is actually progress, not regression

🔥 Final Verdict

You are now accurate enough to make money consistently… but not present enough to capitalize on it consistently

Setup Tags
VIX Inverse Correlation+BOS+CHOCH+FVGYL+LS-LSPDHBullishBSL+OBNWOGWH
Execution Quality
HesitantLate
Emotions
RushedHesitantFrustrated

Chart Links

Written by Cory

Cory publishes the working thesis before the session, not after — this Playbook and Trade Review are part of that same documented process. No signals, no highlight reel.

Read the full story →